Oliver LEHMANN, question 2 (about Present Value)
I have been struggling for a while now with an exercise which requires the PV=FV/(1+r)^n formula.
Weblink is: http://www.oliverlehmann.com/pmp-self-test/75-free-questions.htm
Right answer is supposed to be D but I cannot figured out where comes from the 3%...
I would greatly appreciate that someone show me step by step how to solve this exercise which has been torturing me for 2 days now 
A company has to make a choice between two projects, because the available resources in money and kind are not sufficient to run both at the same time. Each project would take 9 months and would cost $250,000.
The first project is a process optimization which would result in a cost reduction of $120,000 per year. This benefit would be achieved immediately after the end of the project.
The second project would be the development of a new product which could produce the following net profits after the end of the project:
1. year: $ 15,000
2. year: $ 125,000
3. year: $ 220,000
Assumed is a discount rate of 5% per year. Looking at the present values of the benefits of these projects in the first 3 years, what is true?
A) Both projects are equally attractive.
B) The first project is more attractive by app. 7%.
C) The second project is more attractive by app. 5%.
D) The first project is more attractive by app. 3%.


AP
Thu, 03/07/2013 - 21:47
Permalink
Formula is: PV =
Formula is: PV = FV/(1+r)^n
First Project
***********
PV for 1st year = 120000/(1+.05)^1 = 114285.71
PV for 2nd year = 120000/(1+.05)^2 = 108843.54
PV for 3rd year = 120000/(1+.05)^3 = 103662.75
PV for 1st project = 114285.71 + 108843.54 + 103662.75 = 326792
Second Project
***********
PV for 1st year = 15000/(1+.05)^1 = 14285.71
PV for 2nd year = 125000/(1+.05)^2 = 113378.68
PV for 3rd year = 220000/(1+.05)^3 = 190048.38
PV for 2nd project = 14285.71 + 113378.68 + 190048.38 = 317712.77
To find which is attractive
********************
= (326792-317712.77)/317712.77 = 9079.23/317712.77
= 0.0286
To find %
*********
0.0286 * 100 = 2.86% = app. 3%
Hence answer is D) The first project is more attractive by app. 3%.
Shirshendu
Fri, 03/08/2013 - 14:41
Permalink
Thank you AP
Thank You AP ,
Let me know if we are bothering you too much , but can you explain how Mr . Oliver lehmann got the 2nd answer.
Thanks in advance.
Assuming ±3 sigma precision level for each estimate, what is the standard deviation of the allover path?
amar
Fri, 03/08/2013 - 17:01
Permalink
Do they allow calculators in exam ?
It wuld be impossible to get to this result without a calculator, do they allow ? Also, will there be questions of this complexity in th exam ?
Thanks.. this forum is really helpful.
AP
Fri, 03/08/2013 - 17:07
Permalink
Dear Amar, Calculators will
Dear Amar,
Calculators will be in-built in the system. These problems are not at all complex. It may look complex because of the way I have explaned in detail.
If you know the formulae to be applied and if you practice well, then you can easily crack these type of questions under 1 minute.
Regards,
Arun.
amar
Tue, 03/12/2013 - 00:41
Permalink
Thanks AP !!Sounds like only
Thanks AP !!
Sounds like only the smartest person would be a PMP
abourneuf
Mon, 03/11/2013 - 13:37
Permalink
Thank you so much!
Thank you so much! I understand now why I could not get the 3% of difference between A and B... I actually wrongly used the PV = FV/(1+r)^n formula because I used the "n" variable with 3 as period value for Year1, 2 and 3...
AP
Fri, 03/08/2013 - 15:11
Permalink
Always happy to help
SD for allover path = Square root of (allover Variance)
Variance for allover path = Sum of (square of SD) of individual activities
Calculate SD
************
SD = (P-O)/6
Act. A = (24-12)/6 = 2
Act. B = (14-8)/6 = 1
Act. C = (27-15)/6 = 2
Act. D = (28-10)/6 = 3
Act. E = (35-17)/6 = 3
variance = Sum of square of all SDs
= 4+1+4+9+9 = 27
Now, SD for all over path = Square root of allover Varaince
= square root of 27 = 5.196
= App. 5.2 days
Shirshendu
Fri, 03/08/2013 - 15:20
Permalink
Thanks AP
Thanks AP , a good lesson learnt.
Much appreciated , thanks again.
pmalik
Sun, 03/18/2018 - 07:41
Permalink
Scores
The answer & explanations are on Oliver's site. For 1st & 2nd time scores, you can check https://www.pmbypm.com/oliver-lehmann-pmp-questions/