to be quite frank, I am likely going to use it exclusively if people find its quality is high enough. I haven't studied any written material except guidance for each question when I hit "show answer" after answering the question.

I am scoring in the high 70s and low 80s in either the first or second pass of each process group. Passing through the section once and learning from my mistakes and getting a higher score the next time around...Mostly because the first time around I will have a question that I have NO IDEA what the expected answer is, then once I learn...yes that makes sense and I seem to be answer all of that question type correctly after that...

I did the same thing with the CISSP...I had been in an IT Information Assurance environment for several years, and being neck high in the culture and execution of IA gave me all the tools I needed to pass that exam with doing nothing but practice exams to validate my knowledge and readiness.

I think examcentral.net is doing the same thing for me, validating that I already know this stuff and giving me the opportunity to pick up a few more nuggets of information, all because I have been executing as a IT project manager and program manager for several years. Most of the questions and answers seem to be either common sense or follow an expected flow...i.e. knowing which items are inputs, output or tools of processes. I get caught a couple of time here and there though, or I disagree with the answer but that's my opinion not the "correctness" of the answer as far as PMI and PMP exam goes. :)

Does this concern anyone? Would you tell me no please don't take the exam without studying the books, or do you think I am fine and should give the exam a shot?

Thanks,

Scot

double post....sorry